Regler shotcut pour eteindre le PC a la fin de l’exportation
Bonjour,
ca serait bien qu’a la fin de l’exportation de la video, on puisse regler Shotcut pour eteindre le PC, eteindre seulement Shotcut ou ne rien faire.
Lorsque l’exportation dure plusieurs heures, c’est plutot commode.
Merci.
Hello
it would be nice if at the end of the video export, we could set Shotcut to turn off the PC, turn off only Shotcut or do nothing.
When the export takes several hours, it’s rather convenient.
It’s a good idea, this feature isn’t that uncommon among other video editors through the simple GUI: Premiere has it for example by ticking a simple box
That’s understandable too. It can clutter the UI or create some bugs (imagine if Shotcut erroneously shutdown your PC due to a bug)
But at worst, I think that it would at least be helpful to be open about some kind of API to do it easily via shell scripts for those who want to do it. We can also provide some simple tutorials to easily create these scripts on all major operating systems.
Imaginez qu 'on soit obligé de partir precipitamment, en laissant le PC fonctionner, c’est une bonne solution pour economiser de l’argent et eviter que le PC chauffe pour rien.
Handbrake gratuit, y arrive sans probleme, et c’est tellement commode.
Imagine that you are forced to leave in a hurry, by letting the PC work, it’s a good solution to save money and prevent the PC from heating up for nothing.
Free handbrake, it can do it without any problem, and it’s so convenient.
I just leave it on, but only turn off the monitor, and setting the performance on power saving mode. Regarding the heat, it doesn’t happen if you have good airflow and correctly placed parts with good thermal conduction.
As much as it is useful in your perspective, it’s highly rare to have circumstances like these unless you are a police officer or something like that.
And if you are unfamiliar, there is something called as chrome remote desktop, teamviewer and anydesk for the exact same purpose but with full control over your pc.
Handbrake le fait tres bien, pourquoi se priver de cette option si commode…
Handbrake does it very well, why deprive yourself of this convenient option…
Be careful because the task can take longer than expected for one reason or another (bugs, other programs slowing down the export, etc.). In this case, you would end up shutting down the computer before the export is finished which would be disastrous.
Shotcut can also finish the export way quicker than you expect which would result in wasted power consumption.
I am not depriving myself, instead I am having the full control of my pc from the other part of the world, i don’t know why you see that as a negative point, but it’s definitely a plus point for me, i know when to shutdown so one bug doesn’t ruin my whole export, i can edit even after leaving my pc, i could preview my files from outside. I don’t know about your country yet, but my country has 5g everywhere, so now internet speed or data limits no longer a problem.
I don’t need a export shutdown thing, i ain’t even gonna use it anyways if i already have a better option.
Calm down mate, if you personally don’t use a feature, it doesn’t mean that it has no place in the software.
I personally don’t slow down videos, does that mean that this feature should have never been implemented in Shotcut?
Remoting and manually shutting down your PC isn’t the same as doing it automatically via scripts (e.g when you’re sleeping, if you’re busy with something else, if you’re out of the house without internet, etc.).
The feature taking some space in the UI, or worries about bugs/being difficult to maintain across the OS can be a valid concern, but let’s not act like a feature that is widespread in other programs like Premiere, or Handbrake has ZERO reason to exist.
What I was saying is that I personally don’t need it, I have nowhere mentioned that it shouldn’t be not included in shotcut, even in my previous replies, I have mentioned alternatives and never mentioned that it shouldn’t be included… I am seeing that you are thinking that I am raging? Which makes me think words don’t express emotions, do they?
Well to clarify, instead you were telling me that I am depriving myself, for which, obviously I posted what my personal opinions are
One word:- Autohotkey
I have never personally faced that, due to the reason the internet infrastructure is very nicely developed here since like 2018… Sure, obviously we don’t have same conditions. You can use autohotkey for that instead.
Yes, some people want simplicity, some people want full control. Depends on what the majority of the community likes. You obviously wouldn’t like to add a feature to a product if the 95% of the users hate it. If the developers agree to this idea, and there’s enough discussion and likes about it, it would be surely implemented.
Powershell scripts, Bash scripts, Python scripts, etc. are also an option, but they would be more practical if we had an official clean, tested and well-documented API on how to access them through the command-line.
It has been talked about before, but it seems like it is kind of a mess at first glance to be honest:
I know some tricks to automate even software that don’t have a clean command-line API, but imo it’s not something that should be expected from the average normal user.
