I have put together a “lower-thirds banner” generator on my website, where users can easily tailor the various parameters of the banner, including the text, the colours, the speed of animation, the fonts and font-sizes, the icon to use etc.
I then press the “Rerun animation and create HTML” button.
The generated code shows the icon’s code (as can be seen in step 4) but the
animation has not updated on the page.
Does the Twitter icon show when you are on my App page and not when you run the resulting HTML? Or is it missing when you are on the APP page? What browser are you using?
Are you online when you run the resulting HTML since it access fontawesome icons via the directive:
You are not picking up my changes. Can you do a HARD Reload (right click the browser reload button - or press CTRL while clicking the reload), or clear the browser cahe.
I have changed the default icon to the HTML5 icon “<i class="fab fa-html5"></i>” can you check that when you visit my webpage this is the text that is in the box., which will prove you are pickg up the new version. It is definitely working for me, so I’m at a loss. I’m using Chrome too, but on Windows 10.
EDIT: The code near the bottom of the window should say:
OK, I really should look more carefully. I have now fixed this and updated the app yet again. I cannot understand why my system is quite happy with these typos, but yours isn’t.
I just fed it through the W3C HTML validator and it came out as having no more problems.
It however still does not update the icon on your app, it always just shows an empty block.
Perhaps your server is blocking it as it sees it as a cross-site script when you link
to an external site for the icon?
Just a guess, not a server guru.
Everything else like colours, text etc is updated when “rerun”.
Not a problem for me, but can understand it may be for others.
A related question on this, since I (and others) can’t use ShareX and only OBS (don’t use Windows),
what browser component does OBS use?
Is it the same code base as Firefox (so it will have the size issues), or is it more like
Chrome where it works perfectly?